The way I see it the insults, cruel remarks and teasings on the web about PAP's youngest candidate can best be described as a pack of very hungry wolves, so severely starved and on a constant look-out for prey, pouncing on a helpless chick left unguarded out of the coop. It is therefore inevitable as it is a natural behaviour arising from severe starvation.
The ruling party pleas for the netizen's rational thinking alluding to the country's quantum leap to first world economic status, the stable government which attracted foreign investments, the able leadership this far etc etc. However many of its citizens reckon all these at the back of their mind but yet demand change to the one party system. It is almost like an instinctive or innate desire that sometimes defy logic. What do these wolves hunger for? It is as if these wolves were kept in an enclosure or maybe a zoo, were fed their regular meals, but could not live out their life as born hunters gaming at the first smell of blood. The hunter instinct is so well repressed that it bursts out in the form of imagined hunger so exaggerated that it has to be appeased at all cost.
Amongst the social causes that attribute to the fall of the almighty city of Ancient Rome is the decline in patriotism and allegiance to the state, a form of disengagement amongst the masses. This was accentuated by a decline in moral fibre. Citizens lost interest in the government as it became too distant for them.
So if the wolves are behaving hungry, it may still be a good sign. At least they are not lying in coma in their nurseries.
Sunday, April 10, 2011
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Suffer the Children
When Jesus said "Suffer the children" he meant to allow the children to go to him ie. not to forbid them; in olden English 'suffer' means 'allow'. I think Jesus also used children as an imagery of how one can learn from their innocence and humble faith.”
Although I know full well that 'suffer' is not what it means in today's English, this phrase "Suffer the children" still flashes my mind whenever a child shares about what he has to put up with at home. I guess what I really mean is 'How the children suffer!'.
This primary 6 boy whom I am seeing once in about 3 weeks greeted me with "Long time no see", a sign he had a story waiting to tell. He started ranting with mocked irritation about a girl in class who never ever returns things she borrows from him (which does not surprise me as boy-girl relationship often preoccupies their minds and is of great significance in their world). He then went on to fuss about his mum who seems to go back on her promises. So as usual I helped him to be more cognitive of his contribution to such tiffs. Then as he warmed up, the mischievious smile on his face faded and he started to grab the cushion. Bit by bit he tried to talk about what he himself might not understand, the events happening around him. As he spoke I could feel he was trying to make sense of the situation at home and struggling to express his mixed feelings. Apparently he had gone with his mum to consult a doctor and the doctor warned him never to irritate his mother who was given one month MC to cope with stress and anxieties. His parents were divorced and the last he heard from his father was when he called to wish him happy birthday last year.
You can sense that a child is growing up before his time when he swings from "I can't just stand here and watch my mother falling sick" one minute to "She said I could play computer games for one hour but she kept yelling for me to stop before the time's up" the next minute. I have also noticed that amongst children from single families, a common complaint from teachers about them seems to be "day dreaming" or "mind drifting" in class. It wrenches one's heart to see a child struggling to cope with the shattered faith that the world and in particular his home is a safe place to live in.
Although I know full well that 'suffer' is not what it means in today's English, this phrase "Suffer the children" still flashes my mind whenever a child shares about what he has to put up with at home. I guess what I really mean is 'How the children suffer!'.
This primary 6 boy whom I am seeing once in about 3 weeks greeted me with "Long time no see", a sign he had a story waiting to tell. He started ranting with mocked irritation about a girl in class who never ever returns things she borrows from him (which does not surprise me as boy-girl relationship often preoccupies their minds and is of great significance in their world). He then went on to fuss about his mum who seems to go back on her promises. So as usual I helped him to be more cognitive of his contribution to such tiffs. Then as he warmed up, the mischievious smile on his face faded and he started to grab the cushion. Bit by bit he tried to talk about what he himself might not understand, the events happening around him. As he spoke I could feel he was trying to make sense of the situation at home and struggling to express his mixed feelings. Apparently he had gone with his mum to consult a doctor and the doctor warned him never to irritate his mother who was given one month MC to cope with stress and anxieties. His parents were divorced and the last he heard from his father was when he called to wish him happy birthday last year.
You can sense that a child is growing up before his time when he swings from "I can't just stand here and watch my mother falling sick" one minute to "She said I could play computer games for one hour but she kept yelling for me to stop before the time's up" the next minute. I have also noticed that amongst children from single families, a common complaint from teachers about them seems to be "day dreaming" or "mind drifting" in class. It wrenches one's heart to see a child struggling to cope with the shattered faith that the world and in particular his home is a safe place to live in.
Saturday, March 26, 2011
Acts of God?
Today a ST journalist described in disgust certain remarks passed by some people in various parts of the world on the Japanese calamities, some of which tentamount to downright meaness and cruelty. These include cartoonists and comedians poking fun, religious leaders who remarked that the Japanese people deserved the sufferings because they embrace idols and materialism to remarks about it being karma or pay-back from the ravages the Japanese inflicted during the second world war as well as religious extremists claiming that the disasters were acts of God to punish non-believers.
Fortunately on the flip side there were much much more emails, blogs etc calling for prayers for the people of Japan. A friend of mine sent an email with a link that encourages readers to use the power of the mind as a group to help the victims by visualing the cooling of the nucleur reactors.
After I had finished my Chinese Calligraphy homework last weekend, I suddenlty felt like writing a few phrases to express what my heart wished for the afflicted Japanese. As I am almost Chinese illiterate, I surfed the net and found a site which had a whole list of Chinese phrases for blessings. At first sight what seem most relevant are phrases like "Shang Di Bao You" (May god bless/protect you) or "Shen Ci Ni Li Liang" (God bestow you the strength). However after further thoughts such phrases do seem ironical. How on earth can one ask God to protect or bless these people when God could have prevented the tragic events in the first place. If one fails to comprehend the meaning of such wrath, one can also understand why some people really believe that God is sending a message of warning. On the other hand one of my classmates in the Chinese Calligraphy class described the calm and stoicism of the Japanese as an attribute derived from the deeply rooted seed of Zen Buddhism in the country, ie. the seed has blossomed and blessed the people with such strength.
The ST Journalist whom himself experienced a personal tragedy a few years ago concluded "That in the end, most of us who have suffered loss want to be defined not by our trials, but by how we overcome them...The people of Japan, by their quiet courage, have shown themselves to be on truly firm ground."
How then should I pray for them? I wrote "Ke Fu Ni Jing" (Overcome adversity), "Jian Ru Jia Jing" (Moving on to good times) and "Yong Wang Zhi Qian" (Move forward courageouly).
Fortunately on the flip side there were much much more emails, blogs etc calling for prayers for the people of Japan. A friend of mine sent an email with a link that encourages readers to use the power of the mind as a group to help the victims by visualing the cooling of the nucleur reactors.
After I had finished my Chinese Calligraphy homework last weekend, I suddenlty felt like writing a few phrases to express what my heart wished for the afflicted Japanese. As I am almost Chinese illiterate, I surfed the net and found a site which had a whole list of Chinese phrases for blessings. At first sight what seem most relevant are phrases like "Shang Di Bao You" (May god bless/protect you) or "Shen Ci Ni Li Liang" (God bestow you the strength). However after further thoughts such phrases do seem ironical. How on earth can one ask God to protect or bless these people when God could have prevented the tragic events in the first place. If one fails to comprehend the meaning of such wrath, one can also understand why some people really believe that God is sending a message of warning. On the other hand one of my classmates in the Chinese Calligraphy class described the calm and stoicism of the Japanese as an attribute derived from the deeply rooted seed of Zen Buddhism in the country, ie. the seed has blossomed and blessed the people with such strength.
The ST Journalist whom himself experienced a personal tragedy a few years ago concluded "That in the end, most of us who have suffered loss want to be defined not by our trials, but by how we overcome them...The people of Japan, by their quiet courage, have shown themselves to be on truly firm ground."
How then should I pray for them? I wrote "Ke Fu Ni Jing" (Overcome adversity), "Jian Ru Jia Jing" (Moving on to good times) and "Yong Wang Zhi Qian" (Move forward courageouly).
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Strength of the Japanese
Much has been said about the stoic demeanor and resilience of the Japanese in face of the triple calamity in the country. The orderliness at the shelters, the patient queues for basic necessities, the absence of looting, the caring spirit and the calmness in resuming work routine whenever possible evoke admiration from the world all over. One journalist describes it as almost zen like calmness admist the unbelievable tragedies and uncertainties of what may yet to come.
I believe that every world netizen that watches these footages will stop to ponder how they and their own countrymen will behave or react should such tragedies strike in their own country. In my mind the underlying difference has to be selflessness and the fundamental perception of individual versus society.
This helps me recall certain points made by Archbishop Vincent Nichols at a LSE public lecture advocating religious freedom. The topic may seem irrelevant in the context of the discussion above but certain words are meaningful and may be relevant to understanding how different cultures perceive self and society:
"Nevertheless there remains a pervasive assumption within our culture (referring mainly to the West) that we are little more than separate individuals who happen to share the same space, who ultimately owe nothing to society and have no necessary bonds with others – as it has been called, the “unencumbered” self. The only thing we have in common is the ‘market’ – or as it was quaintly put: ‘Tesco ergo sum’. This leaves us with the challenging question about how we actually link the individual with society.... promoting religious freedom, understood in its richest sense, invites us to inhabit a subversive and different story. This begins with the acceptance that we do not come into life as separate individuals but as fundamentally relational. It acknowledges that to be fully human is constituted by our deepening relationships with others, and I would add, with God. ......It is not just that we are born into relationships of dependence, or even that without our relationships we could not grow or develop. It is that only through our relationships – of love, friendship,the enlargement of our social ties - that we can be fulfilled. To be fully human is to be more than an individual - it is to be a person-in-relationship, self- transcendent, creative and emergent.....such a person flourishes in his or her relationality, not living alone in his or her castle, but mixing freely in society, a human being composed never of oneself alone but always through connections with others as well"
Perhaps the Japanese are different because they have this 'self-transcendent' characteristic, probably also ingrained for centuries from a Buddhist culture.
I believe that every world netizen that watches these footages will stop to ponder how they and their own countrymen will behave or react should such tragedies strike in their own country. In my mind the underlying difference has to be selflessness and the fundamental perception of individual versus society.
This helps me recall certain points made by Archbishop Vincent Nichols at a LSE public lecture advocating religious freedom. The topic may seem irrelevant in the context of the discussion above but certain words are meaningful and may be relevant to understanding how different cultures perceive self and society:
"Nevertheless there remains a pervasive assumption within our culture (referring mainly to the West) that we are little more than separate individuals who happen to share the same space, who ultimately owe nothing to society and have no necessary bonds with others – as it has been called, the “unencumbered” self. The only thing we have in common is the ‘market’ – or as it was quaintly put: ‘Tesco ergo sum’. This leaves us with the challenging question about how we actually link the individual with society.... promoting religious freedom, understood in its richest sense, invites us to inhabit a subversive and different story. This begins with the acceptance that we do not come into life as separate individuals but as fundamentally relational. It acknowledges that to be fully human is constituted by our deepening relationships with others, and I would add, with God. ......It is not just that we are born into relationships of dependence, or even that without our relationships we could not grow or develop. It is that only through our relationships – of love, friendship,the enlargement of our social ties - that we can be fulfilled. To be fully human is to be more than an individual - it is to be a person-in-relationship, self- transcendent, creative and emergent.....such a person flourishes in his or her relationality, not living alone in his or her castle, but mixing freely in society, a human being composed never of oneself alone but always through connections with others as well"
Perhaps the Japanese are different because they have this 'self-transcendent' characteristic, probably also ingrained for centuries from a Buddhist culture.
Sunday, March 13, 2011
Nature's wrath
Watching the CNN reporter in Sendai showing the wreckage of what used to be an elementary school with more than 400 children in it when the earthquake and tsunami struck draws a sense of sadness. One imagines the terror the little ones must have felt in their last moments. Apart from footages which show the waters gushing relentlessly inland sweeping planes, houses, vehicles, trees into the vast rice fields inland, there is also a video which tracked the events from the time when the tsunami warning was first blared out until 40 minutes later when the tsunami descended. Old folks and women holding their children tightly moved orderly up the hill slope. When the tsumani occurred they watched in horror the disaster unfolding before their eyes, holding onto each other in terror whilst comforting the little ones who were crying. Just watching these coverages on TV evoke in us a sense of disbelief, horror and helplessness, what more the victims. You feel the fury of nature and are perplexed at its wrath and wonder whether there is something wrong in the way the human specie live that nature has to retaliate in this manner. Even Japan, a country with advanced technology and a system well in place and rehearsed to face such calamities, stood defenceless against nature's temper. One can appreciate why primitive men worshipped nature as their gods, believing in their power. We, the modern men however through our intellect invent, create, change and control as we desire. In times like this we are reminded that there are things not within our grasp, including when our candle of life extinguishes.
Sunday, March 6, 2011
Out of Sight Out of Want
Nowadays I seldom go to Orchard Road unless for an occasional lunch appointment. Last week I made a trip to Kinokuniya at Nee Ann City to buy some children books. Around late afternoon I went to the basement to have some snacks. I found a seat next to a table of well groomed ladies. From their conversation I could deduce they were Indonesian tourists. As their chat became more animated with laughter and hand gestures I began to notice their flashy fingers studded with coloured stones and diamonds.
After a while a group of Japanese tai tai came and plonked themselves and their shopping bags on the table to my right. They were very tastefully dressed. One younger lady was wearing a smart casual black dress which matched so well with her pastel purple clutch bag decked with soft silk roses. I had an interesting time scrutinising these two group of people. Whilst the ladies on my left were colourful and flashy the ladies on my right were tasteful and more pleasing to my eyes. Needless to say I think I look like a poor local cousin stuck in the middle, with my mid calf cargo pants and navy blue stripped T-Shirt which I bought at Premark London for 4 pounds (and which I always think is quite chic).
Instinctively afterwards I started to enter some shops although I meant to head home originally. So I dropped in at Espirit, Zara etc but was thankful that nothing of interest caught my eyes because the pricing wasn't to my liking. Just as I passed Warehouse there was this lovely purple blouse that charmed me (lingering effect of the purple clutch bag)and I dragged myself in to check the price; $149, and dragged myself out again. Even when I worked at my former job, I had never spent more than a $100 bucks on a blouse. "What audacity to spend $149 on a blouse when my current earned income is a tiny fraction of those grandeur days". So you see, whilst you are working you better spend and purchase whatever fancies you because once you retire you will find it difficult to "waste" money. Without the monthly cash inflow of your last drawn salary, you will be on austerity drive forever. You will only be looking at your income statement irrespective of how healthy your balance sheet may be.
Last week CNA also had a live morning show where businesses were invited to showcase their products. There was this business that sells couture jewelery. The camera man did a great job zooming in on an exquisitely beautiful piece of necklace made of a combination of pearls, crystals and diamonds. The designer said it was to give you a feeling that the pearls are floating. The host of the show was enthralled with a pair of dangling saphire ear rings and gave a little squeal when told the price was $60,000. The promoter then remarked that $60k is a very reasonable price to look good.
So I had a week experiencing some "wanting" seduced by the fashion and jewelery industry. For quite some time I have not felt any need to go shopping. In the school environment where I work I just need to look neat walking admist PE teachers wearing shorts and collar T-shirts and lady teachers wearing light and comfortable blouses (whilst trying to keep cool in the non air-cond classrooms and raising their voices on top of the childrens' chatter). Now I also begin to comprehend why people spend thousands on a bag, a piece of clothing or jewelery. They need to blend in with the circle and environment they move in. For me it is better out of sight to be out of want, and to avoid conflict with my internalised austerity drive.
After a while a group of Japanese tai tai came and plonked themselves and their shopping bags on the table to my right. They were very tastefully dressed. One younger lady was wearing a smart casual black dress which matched so well with her pastel purple clutch bag decked with soft silk roses. I had an interesting time scrutinising these two group of people. Whilst the ladies on my left were colourful and flashy the ladies on my right were tasteful and more pleasing to my eyes. Needless to say I think I look like a poor local cousin stuck in the middle, with my mid calf cargo pants and navy blue stripped T-Shirt which I bought at Premark London for 4 pounds (and which I always think is quite chic).
Instinctively afterwards I started to enter some shops although I meant to head home originally. So I dropped in at Espirit, Zara etc but was thankful that nothing of interest caught my eyes because the pricing wasn't to my liking. Just as I passed Warehouse there was this lovely purple blouse that charmed me (lingering effect of the purple clutch bag)and I dragged myself in to check the price; $149, and dragged myself out again. Even when I worked at my former job, I had never spent more than a $100 bucks on a blouse. "What audacity to spend $149 on a blouse when my current earned income is a tiny fraction of those grandeur days". So you see, whilst you are working you better spend and purchase whatever fancies you because once you retire you will find it difficult to "waste" money. Without the monthly cash inflow of your last drawn salary, you will be on austerity drive forever. You will only be looking at your income statement irrespective of how healthy your balance sheet may be.
Last week CNA also had a live morning show where businesses were invited to showcase their products. There was this business that sells couture jewelery. The camera man did a great job zooming in on an exquisitely beautiful piece of necklace made of a combination of pearls, crystals and diamonds. The designer said it was to give you a feeling that the pearls are floating. The host of the show was enthralled with a pair of dangling saphire ear rings and gave a little squeal when told the price was $60,000. The promoter then remarked that $60k is a very reasonable price to look good.
So I had a week experiencing some "wanting" seduced by the fashion and jewelery industry. For quite some time I have not felt any need to go shopping. In the school environment where I work I just need to look neat walking admist PE teachers wearing shorts and collar T-shirts and lady teachers wearing light and comfortable blouses (whilst trying to keep cool in the non air-cond classrooms and raising their voices on top of the childrens' chatter). Now I also begin to comprehend why people spend thousands on a bag, a piece of clothing or jewelery. They need to blend in with the circle and environment they move in. For me it is better out of sight to be out of want, and to avoid conflict with my internalised austerity drive.
Sunday, February 20, 2011
Post-Materialism
Learnt a new term "Post-Materialism" in today's Sunday Times article taken from the New York Times. The article provides a glimpse into the book written by Tyler Cowen named "The Great Stagnation". The author perceives that the US is facing a slowdown or plateau in economic growth because the belief that earning more money brings about a higher quality of life no longer holds true for many people there. These people have a post-materialism mindset which focuses more on living a meaningful life and one of diverse experiences. Comparisons are made between a man born in 1900 and one in the late 1970s, where the former believed the good life could be attained if he earned more income to purchase products which offered material comfort for him and his family. This fuelled consumerism and propelled industrial growth which provided jobs, income and economic growth. This is in contrast with say his grandson who is in his 20s or 30s who loves Facebook, You-tube, Wikipedia which all cost nothing and are provided by people for free. He also prefers holidays which bring him exciting experiences rather than the luxurious comfort of a resort.
I recall my daughter telling me about her classmates in US suspending their education for a year of two to pursue new experiences. This includes volunteering in overseas humanities projects or with some NGOs etc. It makes me think that with affluence young people may be quantum-leaping up Maslow's hiearachy of needs, ie. going for self actualisation even before mid life. I guess it is not such a bad thing after all but I do wonder how life pans out for them. So may be you go round the world, gain a broader perpective and world view and then decide what you want out of life.
Anyway I do not think this is something Singapore is facing. The fact that we are having double digit growth and looking at how alive and kicking consumerism is amongst our young people, I think we are not at "Post-Materialism" phase yet. So the government has a easy task by just fuelling their appetite. However I guess with those wealthy baby boomers who rode on the economic boom, this Post-Materialism mindset may be something they can relate to when they discover that the new Benz or luxurious cruise only excites them briefly and at the back of their mind they are constantly wondering what will really help them achieve a "better" life.
I recall my daughter telling me about her classmates in US suspending their education for a year of two to pursue new experiences. This includes volunteering in overseas humanities projects or with some NGOs etc. It makes me think that with affluence young people may be quantum-leaping up Maslow's hiearachy of needs, ie. going for self actualisation even before mid life. I guess it is not such a bad thing after all but I do wonder how life pans out for them. So may be you go round the world, gain a broader perpective and world view and then decide what you want out of life.
Anyway I do not think this is something Singapore is facing. The fact that we are having double digit growth and looking at how alive and kicking consumerism is amongst our young people, I think we are not at "Post-Materialism" phase yet. So the government has a easy task by just fuelling their appetite. However I guess with those wealthy baby boomers who rode on the economic boom, this Post-Materialism mindset may be something they can relate to when they discover that the new Benz or luxurious cruise only excites them briefly and at the back of their mind they are constantly wondering what will really help them achieve a "better" life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
