Collective Fear

I always thought that my 'kiasu' (fearful of losing out) nature could have risen from adverse childhood experiences in KL, Malaysia. Constantly scoring close to bottom positions in the top class of a good primary school dented my self esteem. Coming from a poor family and surrounded by relatively rich classmates could have made me feel deprived. I hence concluded that these experiences created the constant need to "keep up" with others.

However an article I read entitled ' A Formula for Happiness' made me rethink my conclusion. The article described how Singapore kept sliding in the global ranking of countries' overall happiness over the years, dropping from 22 in 2016 to 34 in 2019 despite faring well in GDP, employment, life expectancy, education and absence of corruption. Meanwhile depression is on the rise among Singapore teenagers.

Experts opined that Singaporeans seem to have adopted the unhealthy narrative of "kiasuism", the need to have more and the fear of losing out. Moreover the education system drummed into students that academic excellence equates to career achievement and happiness. Furthermore the collectivist culture where the opinion of family and friends influence one's attitude and action, perpetuates comparison and competition.

I now have to further analyse whether I actually picked up this communal trait after I moved back to Singapore at 15. My earliest recall of being competitive wasn't really in secondary school or junior college nor working in a statutory board shortly after graduation. Life then was pretty mundane and I was grateful to secure a job which is described as an iron rice bowl. It was in the 70s and 80s and I guess people were generally just grateful with the improved housing, health care and living standards.

My first real taste of competition was to secure a place in a good school for my children in the 90s. Back then after the PSLE (Primary School Leaving examination) results were out, the newspaper would list the entry points required to get into every secondary school. Thus there was a mad competition to place your kids in a reputable primary school which  has a track record of churning out students with high PSLE scores. Even at primary school, the education system introduced another examination at primary 3 to siphon student into different types of upper primary classes. In summary the school system has always focused on ranking based on academic performance. That was the beginning of parents sending their children for tuition classes,a practice which not only persisted but intensified several fold. Even for ECA (Extra Curriculum Activities) in school, a student has to show some level of skills or aptitude before admission depriving many who have the interest but not the means to acquire the skills outside of school.

Another reason for this national 'kiasu' trait could be the inherent 'scarcity mentality' of baby boomers many of whom have experienced poverty in childhood. Baby boomers in general need to buy and hoard things/assets in case of calamity. This is reinforced by the government's persistent brainwashing message of how we need to strife due to a lack of natural resources. To spur citizens to be achievement oriented is necessary for economic growth. Thus the media is obsessed with ranking and winning, consistently splashing about Singapore topping this area and that in global ranking.

I recalled the comment of Tash Aw in an interview with Straits Times on why Singapore never produced an internationally acclaimed author like him. He said in Malaysia there is less expectation of success. "If you don't make it, you are basically measured to the mediocrity around you, so there is no pressure......I think most Malaysians in general enjoy the freedom to find their own level, their own space"


Well looks like the lasting adverse impact of my so called childhood 'strife' may have just been my imagination. It is more likely that I got myself caught up in the Singaporean collective fear of losing and country fervor to win and never to be left behind. Still it is no excuse to sit back and blame external factors for character weakness. If the country is slow in finding a wider range of narrative for happiness, I have to do so on a personal level even though I should have started long ago.

Temple Cat

I have a Siamese cat and to be sure she has a personality. If she is in good mood she will let out a cursory meow when I greet her in the morning. She seems to know cat lovers instinctively snuggling close to them when they visit or 'chats' with them when they engage her in conversation. This however is at her own call meaning she has to be the one to make the first move. When you pick her up by force she will struggle fiercely to break free.

Increasingly she seems also to understand a bit of what I am saying. For instance before I close the door when leaving home, I will ask her "Miao (that's her name), In or Out?". If she wants to laze in the garden she will come scampering through the door before I close it. Otherwise she will ignore me and expresses her wish to remain indoor by either resting on all fours or starting to preen herself. Sometimes instead of talking aloud to myself  I can go to my cat give her a gentle head to head hug and start talking while she listens staring at me with her intense blue eyes.

You may think I am too obsessed and going cranky about my pet, but I think she is not only human in some ways but also a bit spiritual. Every morning when others have left for work  and I am alone at home I will light an incense at the altar and say a quiet prayer. There is no fixed timing however as it depends on how much reading or other tasks I do for the morning. Quite frequently when I start to light the incense Miao Miao will walk in from the back garden and sit beside me making sure she spreads her tail neatly across my feet as if reminding me to remember her in my prayer. I am often puzzled how she knows when I am about to start. Perhaps animals have heightened sensitivity to energy fields and Miao probably picks up my energy for quiet prayer; although I am not sure whether she really wants to be included or just simply likes that quiet moment. (Freud's dog was famously known for snuggling close to his clients suffering from depression offering comfort).

However carrying on my craziness, I learnt from internet that Siamese cats were surrounded by history and legends as follow:

"It is believed the Siamese cat were owned by the  Royal Family of Siam, and used to guard the ancient temples. Only royalty or noblemen were allowed to own them, and their cats served as spirit guardians.
When someone important died, a cat from their household was chosen to receive and house their soul. This lucky cat spent the rest of its life in luxury, pampered and cared for by temple priests. The dead person’s family paid for the cat’s upkeep, as they believed this would bring their loved one good luck in the afterlife."

Hmmm... perhaps the spiritual energy is carried forward life after life in the Siamese cats. Regardless Miao Miao reminds me of another level of consciousness and that this physical world may not be as it seems.

A Slob in the Fitness Class

There a 2 types of people who dislike me, doctors and fitness instructors. Doctors think I ask too many 'smart alec' questions all conceived out of non truths from the web. Fitness instructors find me too slack and impossible to teach.

I now attend a fitness class which is a combo of cardio exercises and stretches. For the first half hour there is pumping exercises to make our heart works faster while the later half is the well longed stretching exercises mainly on the yoga mat. As the class caters to people above 50 years, the instructor, a fortyish guy with crew cut and a single ear ring, says we can do the cardio exercises at our own pace. However he is constantly watching like a hawk when you actually slows down, passing remarks like if his mum can do it he doesn't see why you can't. Hence I try to keep up as much as possible and slow down when his back is turned towards me.

I probably stand out as a sore thumb in his class of 10. Unlike others who are probably dressed for fitness class in their branded fanciful body hugging tops and tights I wear a pair of cotton pants and T shirt with sleeves. No worries, my shoes are branded sports shoes though. I had wanted to get a yoga mat from the sports shops but was aghast that it costs more than 30 bucks. I settled for one that costs $8.80 from CK departmental store. The mat shows embarrassing imprints when my body presses against it. As it is it weighs a ton I didn't like to sling it over my shoulder. Hence I put my yoga mat in a shopping trolley which is also useful for shopping after class. I guess my appearance alone makes my instructor feel unprofessional.

Once when he was fiddling with the blue tooth player complaining that the beat seemed too slow, I remarked it didn't really matter as we were supposed to follow at our own pace. He seemed a bit offended, sarcastically describing us as 小姐 although in his mind he is probably calling me 婆婆 . I can understand how my behaviour and that of some others undermines his sense of professionalism.  Like any good instructor he wants his participants to get the most out of the class and not just to go through the motion. At least the others are motivated enough to get some stylish outfit. I guess it helps when you see how good your body looks in the mirror. If dressing up at work helps to make one more successful, it should also work in the gym. It has been said " If you know you look great chances are you will act it out too".

While googling to see whether it is a myth that one must wear proper fitness attire I came across this website that lists things you should NOT wear for a workout. It includes:

- cotton shirt and pants because cotton absorbs sweat and you will soon be wearing a wet blanket which is conducive for fungal growth. Instead you should wear "sweat-wicking fabric"

-regular bra which may lead to upper back and shoulder pain after the workout (from excessive bouncing I suppose).

-supper baggy clothing because you don't want to hide your body as the trainer needs to assess whether you are stretching the right muscles and body parts (again I am not  really sure of my objectives)

Seems to me it is not all false advertisement to make us part with our money. Yes I think I better step up a bit. There's no place for a slob nor a 婆婆 in a fitness class.

In MY OPINION

Under the draft Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Bill the ministers will be given the power to decide what is false and to order actions. Upon the 'advice' of civil servants, the respective minister decides if a statement is false and whether actions need to be taken to safeguard public interest. The line of actions can include making a correct statement alongside the false content, ordering statement to be taken down, order tech companies to block certain sites or accounts or instruct a police investigation if malicious intent is detected. Of course there is also a recourse for appeal to minister or court for the aggrieved party.

To assure people that freedom of speech is still intact the government says the proposed law deals with statements of fact and not OPINION.

Now I must warn my husband because ever so often he gets his facts all confused and makes a statement which is not really factual and is more of his imagination. Often when I grill him he will admit that is what he thinks. Thus I often tell him he must preclude his statement with "IN MY OPINION" or "I THINK AH..."

So I was just thinking out aloud of the 20 year old lad who expressed that he wanted to throw an egg at a certain minister. If he had said on facebook " IN MY OPINION the minister deserves an online egg " will he be absolved?

Now I also ask myself why am I so frustrated with people who bullshit. I deduce it to my laziness to think twice or analyze what is being said. I don't realise that if I am so easily MISLED it is because I am not curious enough to find out the truth and just want to be spoon fed. (Don't go there I am going to blame the system again!).

Now back to MY OPINION on the draft bill: I WORRY about
- over reliance on a benevolent government with absolute power (never say never, like any great dynasty a government can also deteriorate over time)
- developing a habit in netizens of needing to be told what is true or not
- the poor ministers, they can always tell what is true or not true meh? Is everything in life just black or white, no grey area or ambiguity? Will their judgement not be tinted by conditions, upbringing, values etc etc?

Maybe those movies on Stasi (East German secret police ) and the KGB stir my imagination but I just fear such dark era descending on us.

总而言之 I don't feel good about this (opinion ok?)